Writers & Artists, Hackers & Geeks: End the Stop Online Piracy Act

The US Congress is debating a bill that would end up censoring the internet in broad, even draconian ways. The bill is known as the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). A number of organizations have banded together to stop it, including groups that I've supported for a while, like the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Free Software Foundation, Mozilla, and Creative Commons. I'm particularly interested in stopping the bill as a writer and user of free and open source software. Creative Commons explains on their blog how SOPA will impact these two groups. Here's the pertinent parts of that post (it was written before the Congressional hearings, but the bill is still active):

November 16 the U.S. Congress will hold hearings on a bill that would unfairly, recklessly and capriciously enable and encourage broad censorship of the Internet in the name of suppressing distribution of works not authorized by copyright holders. As Public Knowledge aptly summarizes, the “Stop Online Piracy Act” would seriously “threaten the functioning, freedom, and economic potential of the Internet” by:

• short-circuiting the legal system, giving rightsholders a fast-track to shutting down whole websites;
• creating conflicts between Domain Name System (DNS) servers, making you more vulnerable to hackers, identity theft, and cyberattacks;
• sanctioning government interference with the Internet, making it more censored globally.

SOPA threatens every site on Internet, but would especially harm the commons, as the Electronic Frontier Foundation explains, focusing on free software. The same applies to free and open projects beyond software, which often use CC licenses. While standard public licenses have lowered the costs and risks of legal sharing and collaboration, SOPA would drastically increase both the costs and risks of providing platforms for sharing and collaboration (think sites ranging from individual blogs to massive community projects such as Wikipedia, from open education repositories to Flickr and YouTube), and vaporize accessibility to huge swathes of free culture, whether because running a platform becomes too costly, or a single possibly infringing item causes an entire domain to be taken down.
The trend that one can plot from the DMCA (1998) to SOPA, and continued extensions and expansions of copyright and related restrictions around the world, also demonstrate the incredible importance of the commons for healthy information policy and a healthy Internet — almost all other “IP” policy developments have been negative for society at large. The DMCA was decried by advocates of free speech and the Internet, and has over past 13 years had many harmful effects. Now, in 2011, some think that the U.S. Congress ‘struck the right balance’ in 1998, while big content is dissatisfied, and with SOPA wants to ratchet the ‘balance’ (watch out, 2024!) much further to their short-term advantage.

EFF has a form to write to Congress. Please fill it out and let your voice be heard.